young adults and evangelism, by the rev. steve woolley

Nov 2nd, 2007 by Fr. Paul | 1

yam coffeeAs The Episcopal Church continues to grow into its role as an active church, in both word and deed, we’re invited to re-consider the rightful place of “evangelism” in our shared practice of Christian discipleship. What does it look like? What does it sound like? What does it feel like?

Most of us know what we don’t want evangelism to be like, but few of us have taken the next step to reconstruct an effective Episcopal evangelism. The Rev. Steve Woolley, rector of St. Paul’s, Walla Walla and one of the finest people in the church, has the offered the following piece as a way to stir up conversation about the young adults and the ethos of an emerging evangelism. Have a read and leave a note!

Young Adults and Christianity by Rev. Steven Woolley, Walla Walla

The Barna Group is a well known Christian survey firm respected for the quality of its work while, at the same time, strongly endorsing a conservative Evangelical approach to the faith, particularly among those whom they call “born again.” So it was a bit of a surprise to receive their September 24 update revealing that a growing percentage of young people between the ages of 16 and 29, both Christians and others, have a negative view of Christianity. Only 16% of non-Christian youth have a positive view of Christianity, according to their findings. And only 3% have a positive view of Evangelicals. They are joined in that attitude by church going youth; apparently 80% of them agree that Christians are judgmental, hypocritical, too political and obsessed with being anti-homosexual. Christians on our local college campus (as represented by a conservative group once a part of the Intervarsity Christian Fellowship) are often and unfairly caricatured as being dull, dense, narrow minded, rude, holier-than-thou, bible-thumping jerks.

For the most part, these attitudes can be laid a the feet of the so-called Christian Right epitomized by a few well known televangelists and certain church related organizations promoting what they call “family values.” I believe that we Episcopalians, and most other “main-line” churches that have been faithful to the classical and progressive traditions of the Church, offer a far different approach that is more deeply rooted in the gospel message and Christ’s commandment to love one another as he loved us. But we have been miserable failures as bold evangelists willing to proclaim that with power and conviction. We have been too much concerned with defending ourselves against fundamentalist accusations or wringing our hands at the daunting tasks that confront us. We have been too easily distracted by a few dissenting voices determined to wreak havoc on our unity in Christ.

The same Barna Group has time and again confirmed that there is a desperate spiritual hunger out there, especially among young people. We know what will satisfy that hunger. We know where to find it. We know how to serve it up in generous proportions. We can assert with all integrity that through Scripture, tradition and reason we offer an intellectually valid and exciting engagement with God in Christ Jesus that encompasses the wholeness of God’s love for all persons. Respecting the dignity of every human being and doing our best to seek and serve Christ in all persons, we recognize that we are but jars of clay full of our own cracks, leaks and limitations. We have no warrant to be judgmental. But we do have a warrant to be bold in proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ that opens all of life, now and to eternity, to all persons at all times in all places.

One Comment on “young adults and evangelism, by the rev. steve woolley”


  1. Brandon Barnes said:

    If form follows function, then I guess we have to ask ourselves, “What is it that we want to accomplish by evangelism?” Unlike evangelicals — who have unfortunately co-opted the term evangelism — we’re not out to induce (create?) a spiritual crisis in another individual and bring them to a born-again experience. We’re seeking to inspire hope and faith in others, but we will not be doing so anonymously. We do it “in the name of Christ.” We offer Christ. We offer God. We offer a fellowship in which the Spirit can warm the hearts of people who search for meaning.

    What’s contributed to the problems of evangelical evangelism is that it seeks a prescribed, predetermined end — a soul “won” for Christ. With that comes a strong anxiety for the evangelist and not a little frustration when that happens. Compounded with the huge anxieties evangelicals feel over the society around them, it’s bound to come off wrong, however well-intentioned it may be.

    One thing we cannot do in seeking to reconstruct evangelism is to construct a programmatic model for it. We can’t know most days where we’ll be from one hour to the next; life “happens.” So, too, does God. “The Spirit blows where it wills,” and our only duty (to call it that) is to remain continuously open to new situations, experiences and meeting with new people. If we are happy with the faith we have found (of whatever flavor) in Christ, then that contentment will commend itself to others far better than any crisis-ridden rhetoric that has been perfected to a frenzy by this very vocal members of the Christian Right.

    My own anxieties caused by the over-misrepresentation of Jesus in this country makes me very leery of the term “evangelism.” But, you’re right, Paul, we have to reclaim it and “model” it for others. It will take our collective imaginations and spiritual strength to forge a better way. I tend to favor spotanaeity over programmatic revivalism, and I hope that’s just not reaction formation from past experiences at work. I rely on the insight of others in our community of faith while also doing my best to bring something to the table.

Leave a Reply